Classical liberalism

From Wikipedia

HomePage | Recent changes | View source | Discuss this page | Page history | Log in |

Printable version | Disclaimers | Privacy policy

Classical liberalism is a term coined by libertarian political theorists in the 20th century to distinguish their ideology from that of 20th-century liberals while implying that libertarianism, not liberalism, is true to historical liberal thought. It follows a tradition of thought from John Locke to Adam Smith to Frederic Bastiat to Ludwig von Mises to Anthony de Jasay, of philosophers, economists, and political thinkers, who study and promote individual liberty, notably against the arbitrary power of governments. See libertarianism.

Classical Liberalism vs Political Liberalism

Classical liberalism is a tradition of thinkers who developed an ideology opposed to politics. Political liberalism on the other hand, is a tradition of politicians (particularly from english and american liberal parties), who only claim a vague relationship with some liberal thinkers. There is little common between the two.

For instance, John Stuart Mill, whose works were notably influenced by his socialist wife, is considered by libertarians as a fringe author in their philosophical tradition, whereas, as member of parliament, he is considered by political liberals as a key person in their tradition. Lord Acton, a classical liberal author, also had some acknowledged influence on Gladstone, a liberal politician. Finally, some renowned economists and politicians in the 1920s and 1930s, at the time when collectivist theories were at their highest influence, renounced to basic principles of classical liberalism while still calling themselves "liberal" in contrast with overtly collectivist economists. That's as far as the relationship goes between these two traditions.

Disputed meanings of the term

Some try restrict the term classical liberalism so as to stop in the nineteenth century or so. Libertarians argue that is no interruption, no massive rejection or the past and no fork in the classical liberal tradition - only a single uninterrupted tradition, the only one which does lay claim to such theorists as Locke, Hume, Smith, Say and Bastiat as opposed to Hobbes, Rousseau, Proudhon or Marx.

Similarly, some split classical liberalism into a political liberalism and an economic liberalism, so as to be able to consider liberal justifications of democracy independently from liberal justifications of capitalism. But libertarian thinkers themselves claim that this is missing the point, because the classical liberal tradition is neither political nor economical: it is a theory of Law - of what is or isn't legitimate for people to do.

/Talk