Thermodynamics/Talk

HomePage | Recent changes | View source | Discuss this page | Page history | Log in |

Printable version | Disclaimers | Privacy policy

Vhung wrote what looks like a brand new Thermodynamics article. Why? Why not try to adapt the old one, or, if the old one is irremediably bad, why not move it to a /Talk page? Basically, we don't want to have to vote about which version is the best. That's not the wiki way... --LMS 0th-law:

• It is possible to build a thermometer.
• That is: If objects A and B are \

in thermal equilibrium with each other, \ and objects B and C are in thermal \ equilibrium with each other, then objects \ A and C are also in thermal equilibrium \ with each other.

• Two objects are in thermal equilibrium \

with each other, if their macroscopic \ properties, such as electrical resistance \ or volume, do not change with time when \ these objects are brought into thermal \ contact with each other.

Excised old version

1st-law:

• Convervation of Energy

2nd-law:

• Degradation of Energy (irreversibilities)
• "Nothing goes without loss"
• concept of Entropy (s)
• T.ds = du + p.dv
• T.ds = dh - v.dp

In lay terms,

• You can't win.
• You can't even break even.
• And you can't get out of the game.

3rd-law:

Would it be unfair of me to suggest that this page requires some serious refactoring?  :-) --LMS

Refactoring thermodynamics is best attempted by madmen or fools, or by foolish madmen such as Clifford Truesdell.

There should be a reference to the relationship between Thermodinamics and Statistical Mechanics